AI for Lawyers: Can AI Robots Defend a Human in Court?
Technology is not meant to displace lawyers but instead to make their work more efficient.
A Goldman Sachs report revealed that Artificial Intelligence (AI) could replace 300 million full-time jobs with automation. Advanced AI tools have consistently demonstrated efficiency, accuracy, and speed across various domains, including the legal domain.
AI-powered services are transforming legal research, document analysis, case prediction, and more. AI for contract review is widely used by attorneys and lawyers worldwide. With this rapid technological progress, a pressing question that looms over the legal landscape is: Will AI replace lawyers?
The impact of technology on law is reminiscent of the growth of e-commerce. Though the widespread development of e-commerce platforms didn’t entirely eradicate brick-and-mortar stores, it did instigate a profound metamorphosis in the retail sector, which resulted in better service and higher customer satisfaction.
Similarly, the advent of AI lawyers would usher in an unavoidable paradigm shift within the legal domain. Automating repetitive, rule-based tasks, the AI lawyer streamlines cumbersome legal processes and helps achieve unparalleled speed and accuracy.
So, will lawyers be automated with AI Robot lawyers replacing human lawyers?
No. The ultimate goal of AI in the legal space is not to replace human lawyers but to empower attorneys to deliver superior legal services.
Roles In Legal That AI Cannot Currently Emulate
AI has undoubtedly created a seismic shift within the legal profession. Despite these ground-breaking shifts, there remain distinct roles in which human lawyers excel, and AI struggles to emulate.
The intricacies of legal practice often necessitate interpretation, contextual understanding, and empathy. This underscores an indispensable need for the nuanced expertise, experience, and creative problem-solving skills that human lawyers bring.
Here are a few key areas where the unique qualities of human lawyers shine, emphasizing the indispensable human touch in law practice.
1. Creative Approach to Strategy
The human mind can ‘think outside the box.’
Legal issues often require more than just a straightforward application of rules. They demand innovative approaches to navigate the complexities of the law. Human lawyers bring a level of strategic thinking to the table. They can foresee potential outcomes, anticipate counterarguments, and craft novel solutions.
AI is a powerful tool for processing vast amounts of data. However, evolving lawyer technology needs more intuitive and creative thinking to address legal challenges dynamically.
2. The Art of Resolution and Negotiation
Conflict resolution and negotiation are the cornerstones of a lawyer’s expertise.
Successful resolution of conflicts transcends a mere understanding of legal precedents. It demands a deep understanding of human dynamics, emotions, and the art of compromise. Human lawyers excel at reading the subtleties of a situation, adjusting their strategies, and cultivating relationships conducive to effective negotiation.
AI struggles to capture the nuances of human emotions and interpersonal dynamics. The AI lawyer thus fails to replicate the finesse of human negotiations and conflict resolutions.
3. Emotional and Empathetic Intelligence
While AI excels at facial recognition, understanding nuanced facial cues eludes it.
Humans possess a remarkable knack for precisely interpreting emotional subtext. Human lawyers employ emotional intelligence and empathy in interactions with clients, witnesses, and opposing counsel. These interpersonal skills help build trust, understand client needs, and represent them effectively.
While AI lawyers can efficiently process tons of information, they need help comprehending emotionally charged aspects of legal contexts. Thus, the human touch of empathy remains an irreplaceable element in legal practice.
4. Interpretation of Gray Areas
AI lawyers function well when presented with quantifiable data. However, there are many “gray areas” within the intricate field of legal practice. These involve emotions, ethical considerations, and subjective interpretations.
Human lawyers excel in interpreting these gray areas, drawing on legal expertise, contextual understanding, and the ability to apply nuanced reasoning.
AI, reliant on programmed algorithms and predefined rules, struggles when faced with ambiguity. It lacks the capacity for subjective interpretation and contextual adaptation.
5. Critical Thinking
Thinking like a lawyer goes beyond knowing the law; it involves cultivating a logical, analytical, and creative approach to problem-solving and finding solutions. Human lawyers can identify critical elements, extract insights, and use them to form persuasive arguments, judgments, and intuitions.
AI lawyers can analyze a document with high accuracy and speed, too. However, they lack the autonomy for independent thinking necessary to make sound decisions and judgments. Nevertheless, AI will assist in legal decision-making with data, facts, and analytics in the near future.
6. Complex Problem-Solving
Complex problem-solving necessitates the cognitive understanding of the human brain.
In the realm of legal challenges, effective problem-solving is paramount. Human lawyers can navigate complexities, comprehend intricate reasons, consider unforeseen circumstances, and adapt strategies in real-time.
AI lawyers lack the holistic and adaptive problem-solving approach that characterizes human cognition.
7. Planning and Decision Making
From devising case strategies to meticulous trial preparation, planning demands foresight and adaptability. These are currently beyond the capabilities of AI. The human capacity to foresee, adapt, and prioritize remains a distinctive strength in planning.
While AI excels in specific tasks and processes, it needs help to emulate human-centric planning. It lacks the adaptability, intuition, and a deep understanding of contextual intricacies that play pivotal roles in planning.
In reflection, it is evident that AI has significantly reshaped the legal terrain. However, amidst these advancements, certain fundamental human qualities stand irreplaceable. The capacity for strategic thinking, emotional intelligence, and the ability to navigate ambiguity are essential facets of legal practice where human lawyers shine.
Comparative Study: AI Vs. Human Lawyers
AI lawyers are no replacement for human attorneys, at least not yet!
However, there are several areas in the legal realm where legal technology surpasses humans in terms of accuracy, speed, and efficiency. Law firms using Artificial Intelligence reported significant improvement in reviewing contracts, analyzing texts, extracting summaries, or predicting outcomes.
The former assistant general counsel at Microsoft, Lucy Bassli, said, “When five paralegals review contracts, each approaches it in five distinct ways. In contrast, AI provides consistent results. The engine applies the same contract rules — pre-approved by a legal decision-maker — in every review.”
A 2017 experiment conducted in London also demonstrated the supremacy of AI over human attorneys in terms of predictions. The experiment involved over 100 lawyers with years of experience in legal practice reviewing applications for a specific credit card irregularity. The accuracy of human predictions was 66.3%, while an AI tool could make more rational predictions with 86.6% accuracy.
Not just this. There are several studies showcasing the superiority of AI over human lawyers.
In a recent study, LawGeeks compared the performance of an AI engine with that of human lawyers. This study pitted an AI engine trained to evaluate contracts against twenty US-trained lawyers with extensive legal and contract review expertise.
The International Association for Contract and Commercial Management (IACCM) reported that 83% of businesses are dissatisfied with their contract reviewing process. This underscores a critical demand for a contract review solution that efficiently evaluates thousands of routine contracts daily.
This study aimed to evaluate the efficiency of an AI-based tool for reviewing such contracts. The core task of this study was to review five commercial Non-Disclosure Agreements (NDAs) comprising 153 paragraphs.
Test Instructions
The requirement was “an in-depth review of the legal clauses in the five NDAs.” They were to identify and highlight legal issues, including arbitration, confidentiality of relationship, and indemnification. Each participant was scored based on their accuracy in spotting legal matters.
Results
The top attorney achieved an impressive accuracy rate of 94.94%, while the average human score was 84.84%. Notably, the AI achieved a remarkable score of 94.55%, which was at par with the top-performing attorney and significantly higher than the average attorney scores.
Regarding efficiency, the human lawyers took an average of 92 minutes to review all five NDAs. The slowest human lawyer took 156 minutes, while the quickest completed the task in 51 minutes. In stark contrast, the AI engine completed the review process in 26 seconds.
One of the participants, Grant Gulovsen, said, “Attorneys spend so much of their time creating or reviewing documents like NDAs, which are so fundamentally similar to one another.”
These results emphasize that AI surpasses experienced human lawyers in speed, accuracy, consistency, and cost efficiency. It further highlights the legal domain’s tolerance for consistent inaccuracy. This prompts a re-evaluation of concerns about AI integration.
This brings us to the burning question — Is AI the future of law? Are AI-powered robot lawyers a reality? Will an AI robot lawyer walk down the courtroom? Can AI replace a judge?
Read the Full Article: AI for Lawyers: Can AI Robots Defend a Human in Court?
